Scientific journal

New Psychological Research

Kryuchkov K.S. Ongoing disputes on therapy efficacy: ‘golden standards’ and ‘common factors’

Kirill S. Kryuchkov, M.S., LLB, Board Member of the World Association for Person Centered & Experiential Psychotherapy & Counseling (WAPCEPC), Senior Lecturer, Department of psychotherapy and psychological counseling, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis; bld. 34–14, Kutuzovsky av., Moscow, Russia, 121170; kkryuchkov@gmail.com

In the present paper, the author reviews current research and theoretical studies dedicated to psychotherapy efficacy. The author polemizes that ‘Evidence-Based Approaches’ are the most efficient in psychotherapy and that psychotherapy approaches must be tested against natural sciences and medical criteria of efficacy. Author reviews studies dedicated to the ‘Dodo-bird effect’ (equivalency paradox) and studies that refute the conjectures that some forms of treatment (namely, CBT or EBT) are more efficient than the others. The author also reviews ‘common factors studies’ that emphasize the importance of psychotherapist own professional and personal qualities rather than techniques, or therapeutic modality therapists prefer. The author warns that psychotherapy should not be reduced to the set of ‘skills’ or techniques. The person – psychotherapist – is a key figure of psychotherapy, and this figure should not be ‘put out of the brackets’ of the psychotherapy realm.

Keywords: psychotherapy research, psychotherapy efficacy, psychotherapy skills, common factors theory, equivalency paradox, dodo-bird effect

For citation: Kryuchkov, K.S. (2021). Ongoing disputes on therapy efficacy: ‘golden standards’ and ‘common factors’ in psychotherapy. New Psychological Research, No. 2, pp. 100–114, DOI: 10.51217/npsyresearch_2021_01_02_06 

 

Acknowledgement

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project 20‐313‐90031.

References

Anderson, T., Lunnen, K.M., Ogles, B.M. (2010). Putting models and techniques in context. In: B.L. Duncan (Ed.), The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy (pp. 143–166). Washington DC: APA.

Baardseth, T.P., Goldberg, S.B., Pace, B.T., Wislocki, A.P., Frost, N.D., Siddiqui, J.R., (…) Wampold, B.E. (2013). Cognitive-behavioral therapy versus other therapies: Redux. Clinical psychology review33(3), 395–405.

Campbell, L.F., Norcross, J.C., Vasquez, M.J., Kaslow, N.J. (2013). Recognition of psychotherapy effectiveness: The APA resolution. Psychotherapy50(1), 98–101.

Cuijpers, P., Berking, M., Andersson, G., Quigley L., Kleiboer A., Dobson K.S. (2013). A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 58(7), 376–385.

Drisko, J.W., Grady, M.D. (2019). Evidence-based practice in clinical social work. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Hill, C.E. (2009). Helping skills: Facilitating, exploration, insight, and action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Imel, Z.E., Wampold, B.E. (2008). The importance of treatment and the science of common factors in psychotherapy. In S.D. Brown, R.W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 249–266). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Kholmogorova, A.B. (2009). Two conflictory methodologies for psychotherapy and its efficiency research: seeking a way out. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya, 17(4), 5–26.

Kholmogorova, A.B. (2010). Two conflicting methodologies in the studies of psychotherapy and its efficacy: in search for a third way. Part 2. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya, 18(1), 14–37.

Kholmogorova, A.B., Garanyan, N.G., Nikitina, I.V., Pugovkina, O.D. (2009). Research concerning the process of psychotherapy and its efficacy: current situation. Part 1. Sotsial’naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya19(3), 92–100.

Kholmogorova, A.B., Garanyan, N.G., Nikitina, I.V., Pugovkina, O.D. (2010). Research concerning the process of psychotherapy and its efficacy: current situation. Part 2. Sotsial’naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya20(1), 70–79.

Kolotilshikova, E.A., Mizinova, E.B., Poltorak, S.V., Chekhlatyi, E.I. (2011). Motivation in psychotherapy (Literature review). Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii imeni VM Bekhtereva, 2, 13–16.

Lambert, M.J., Norcross, J.C. (1992). Handbook of psychotherapy integration. New York: Basic Books.

Laska, K.M., Gurman, A.S., Wampold, B.E. (2014). Expanding the lens of evidence-based practice in psychotherapy: A common factors perspective. Psychotherapy51(4), 467–481.

Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T.P., Berman, J.S. (…) Krause, E.D. (2002). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well—mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice9(1), 2–12.

Luborsky, L., Singer, B., Luborsky, L. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that everyone has won and all must have prizes? Archives of general psychiatry32(8), 995–1008.

Mendelevich, V.D. (2019). Evidence-based psychotherapy:between the possible and the necessary. Nevrologicheskii vestnik, 51(2), 5–12.

Nahum, D., Alfonso, C.A., Sönmez, E. (2019). Common factors in psychotherapy. In A. Javed, K.N. Fountoulakis (Eds.), Advances in psychiatry (pp. 471–481). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Norcross, J.C., Lambert, M.J. (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work II. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022180

Orlov, A.B. (2006). The Nascent Psychotherapy. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki3(1), 82–96.

Rogers, C. (2012). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality changes. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa, 1, 8–25.

Thomas, M.L. (2006). The contributing factors of change in a therapeutic process. Contemporary Family Therapy28(2), 201–210.

Tolin, D.F. (2010). Is cognitive–behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies?: A meta-analytic review. Clinical psychology review30(6), 710–720.

Tracey, T.J., Lichtenberg, J.W., Goodyear, R.K., Claiborn, C.D., Wampold, B.E. (2003). Concept mapping of therapeutic common factors. Psychotherapy Research13(4), 401–413.

Truijens, F., Zühlke‐van Hulzen, L., Vanheule, S. (2019). To manualize, or not to manualize: Is that still the question? A systematic review of empirical evidence for manual superiority in psychological treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology75(3), 329–343.

Vasilenko, D., Kucherenko, V., Petrenko, V. (2020). The Tower of Babel of Psychotherapy. Psychology. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 17(1), 10–26.

Wampold, B.E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry14(3), 270–277.

Wampold, B.E., Minami, T., Baskin, T.W., Tierney, S.C. (2002). A meta-(re) analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy versus ‘other therapies’ for depression. Journal of affective disorders68(2–3), 159–165.

Wampold, B.E., Mondin, G.W., Moody, M., Ahn, H.N. (1997a). The flat earth as a metaphor for the evidence for uniform efficacy of bona fide psychotherapies: Reply to Crits-Christoph (1997) and Howard et al. (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.226

Wampold, B.E., Mondin, G.W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., Ahn, H.N. (1997b). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically,” all must have prizes.” Psychological bulletin122(3), 203–215.

keywords: psychotherapy research, psychotherapy efficacy, psychotherapy skills, common factors theory, equivalency paradox, dodo-bird effect

received 22 June 2021

published 22 June 2021

download PDF